Home Guides kia sportage vs hyundai tucson reliability

Kia Sportage vs Hyundai Tucson: Which Is More Reliable?

2,010,711 MOT tests compared: Kia Sportage vs Hyundai Tucson reliability data reveals which Korean SUV twin actually holds up better in the MOT bay.

261M+ MOT Records
2 Models Compared
2,010,711 Tests Analysed
540 Top Score /1000
Free check Checking a Kia Sportage or a Hyundai Tucson? Free MOT history, health score & red flags. £4.99 to unlock the finance, write-off & stolen check.
UK
Kia Sportage and Hyundai Tucson parked side by side, PlateInsight MOT reliability comparison
Kia Sportage or Hyundai Tucson? Millions of MOT results split them.

The Kia Sportage and Hyundai Tucson share so much engineering that owners' forums argue for pages about which platform quirks belong to which badge. Same parent company, same Korean-built engines and gearboxes in many trims, similar chassis architecture, and famously long warranties (seven years for the Kia, five for the Hyundai). On paper it should be a coin flip. We pulled 2,010,711 MOT tests across both models from 2010 to 2021 to see if the data agrees.

It doesn't, not quite. The two cars are close, closer than most rival pairings we've looked at, but one comes out ahead consistently enough that it's worth naming a winner rather than shrugging and calling it even.

The short version: The Hyundai Tucson beats the Kia Sportage on our reliability score by 18 points, backed by a 1.7 percentage point higher pass rate and fewer defects per test. Both cars share roughly the same annual mileage, so the gap comes down to how each generation was built and specced, not how hard owners drove them.

The Data Verdict

The Hyundai Tucson is the more reliable car, by 18 points

Kia Sportage
522 /1000
84.3% MOT pass rate
Hyundai Tucson
540 /1000
86.0% MOT pass rate

Like-for-like comparison across the years both cars were on sale (2010-2021), from 2,010,711 real DVSA MOT tests. Scores out of 1000, higher is better.

Head-to-Head: The Numbers (2010-2021)

MetricKia SportageHyundai Tucson
Reliability score (/1000)523541
MOT pass rate84.3%86.0%
First MOT pass rate (age 3)85.6%86.9%
Average defects per test1.461.34
Typical annual mileage7,572 mi7,545 mi
MOT tests analysed1,308,540702,171
Vehicles tracked195,632113,057
34244254264256052320105015402015536564201653955720175365402018499507201944245720204414222021Reliability Score by YearKia SportageHyundai Tucson

Pass Rate and Score, Year by Year

YearKia Sportage pass (score)Hyundai Tucson pass (score)Stronger
201076.8% (561)75.9% (523)Kia Sportage
201581.5% (502)83.1% (541)Hyundai Tucson
201683.8% (536)85.0% (565)Hyundai Tucson
201785.7% (539)86.5% (558)Hyundai Tucson
201886.4% (536)86.8% (540)Even
201986.4% (499)87.0% (507)Even
202086.3% (442)86.8% (457)Hyundai Tucson
202186.9% (441)86.2% (422)Kia Sportage

Shared years only. Kia Sportage data also covers 2011-2014, 2022; Hyundai Tucson data also covers 2022, covered in the full year-by-year guides below.

What Actually Fails on Each

Recorded defects and advisories per 100 MOT tests by DVSA inspection category, 2010-2021. A test can record more than one defect.

Kia Sportage

  • Tyres, wheels and suspension: 98.9 per 100 tests typically around 56,500 miles
  • Brakes: 64.2 per 100 tests typically around 56,500 miles
  • Other: 22.7 per 100 tests typically around 56,500 miles
  • Lights and electrics: 17.9 per 100 tests typically around 64,000 miles
  • Visibility (wipers, washers, windscreen): 17.7 per 100 tests typically around 60,000 miles

Hyundai Tucson

  • Tyres, wheels and suspension: 59.2 per 100 tests typically around 44,000 miles
  • Brakes: 35.5 per 100 tests typically around 45,000 miles
  • Other: 13.3 per 100 tests typically around 44,000 miles
  • Visibility (wipers, washers, windscreen): 7.7 per 100 tests typically around 44,000 miles
  • Lights and electrics: 3.8 per 100 tests typically around 46,000 miles

The Best Year to Buy Each

Reliability scores are age-adjusted: each year is judged against other cars of the same age. So when an older year out-scores a newer one, it means it holds up unusually well for its age, not that it will need less work than a much newer car. How our scores work.

Best year to buy
KIA SPORTAGE (2014)
548
/1000
81.4% pass rate213,666 tests19,961 vehicles
Pass rate81.4%
Full Kia Sportage year-by-year breakdown →
Best year to buy
HYUNDAI TUCSON (2018)
540
/1000
86.8% pass rate147,101 tests25,003 vehicles
Pass rate86.8%
Full Hyundai Tucson year-by-year breakdown →

Why Does the Tucson Edge Out the Sportage?

The overall numbers put the Tucson ahead, and the defect data explains a good chunk of why. The Tucson picks up fewer issues per test than the Sportage, and the gap is widest in the tyres, wheels and suspension category, by far the biggest defect generator for both cars. The Sportage's rate here is a lot higher than the Tucson's, even though the two models are mechanically closer than almost any other pairing sold in this period.

Some of that comes down to trim mix and wheel sizes fitted across the UK range over the years. Some of it probably reflects real differences in suspension bushings and geometry tuning between the two badges, since Hyundai and Kia's UK cars aren't always specced identically despite sharing a platform. Brakes tell a similar story: the Sportage has a noticeably higher defect rate here too. None of this makes the Sportage a bad car. Its pass rate is still solid for an SUV. But the Tucson is the easier car to live with when MOT time comes around.

Annual mileage is almost identical between the two, both sit around 7,500 miles a year, so this isn't a case of one model being driven harder. The difference is built into the cars themselves.

What Do the Defect Patterns Actually Mean for Buyers?

Look past the headline categories and the story sharpens. Tyres, wheels and suspension dominates both cars' fault sheets, which is normal for a family SUV carrying extra weight and higher ride heights than a hatchback. But the size of the gap between the two here is the biggest single differentiator in this whole comparison. If you're buying a used Sportage, budget for suspension components (arms, bushes) and tyre wear, especially past 55,000-60,000 miles, which is roughly where these defects start clustering in the data.

The Tucson's faults show up at slightly lower mileages on average, but at a lower rate overall. That's the trade-off worth understanding before you buy either car.

So Which One Should You Buy?

If you're choosing between a used Sportage and a used Tucson with similar age, mileage and price, the data gives a mild but clear nudge towards the Tucson. It's not a landslide. An 18-point reliability gap and 1.7 percentage points on pass rate matter, but they won't turn a well-maintained Sportage into a bad buy or a neglected Tucson into a good one.

What matters more is the individual car's history. Check the MOT record for repeated advisories on suspension and tyres before you commit, whichever badge is on the boot. A Sportage with a clean suspension history is a better bet than a Tucson that's been limping through advisories for three years running.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Hyundai Tucson more reliable than the Kia Sportage?

According to our MOT data across 2,010,711 tests from 2010 to 2021, yes. The Tucson scores 18 points higher on our reliability index and has a 1.7 percentage point higher pass rate, mostly thanks to fewer suspension and brake defects.

Why does the Sportage have more suspension defects than the Tucson?

It's likely a mix of trim and wheel-size differences across UK model years plus genuine differences in suspension bushing and geometry tuning between the two badges, even though they share a platform. Hyundai and Kia don't always spec their UK-market cars identically.

At what mileage do these defects start appearing?

Suspension and tyre defects on the Sportage start clustering around 55,000 to 60,000 miles in our data. The Tucson's faults appear at slightly lower average mileages but at a lower overall rate.

Do Sportage and Tucson owners drive similar mileages?

Yes, both average around 7,500 miles a year, so the reliability gap isn't down to one model being driven harder than the other.

Our Verdict

The Tucson wins this one, but not by a landslide. It's a consistent, moderate edge built mainly on fewer suspension and brake defects, not some enormous quality gulf. If you already prefer one badge's styling, warranty terms, or dealer network, that preference is a perfectly reasonable tiebreaker. But if you're purely going on reliability data, the Tucson is the safer statistical bet, and the tyres, wheels and suspension category is where you should focus your pre-purchase inspection on either car.

A reliable model is only half the story. The exact Kia Sportage or Hyundai Tucson you are looking at could be clocked, on outstanding finance, or a past write-off. Check the specific car before you commit.

Free check
Picked your winner? Check the exact car.
Free health score, full MOT history & red flags in seconds. Only pay £4.99 if you want to unlock the finance, write-off & stolen check, plus market valuation and more.
UK
Official DVLA, DVSA & trusted industry data Instant No account needed

Two cars built from the same bones, and yet the MOT data still finds a gap between them. That's the sort of thing spec sheets and brochures never tell you. If you're cross-shopping either model, run the exact registration through PlateInsight before you hand over any money, because averages tell you what to expect, not what you're actually buying.

You might also like

Mazda 3 vs Ford Focus: Which Is More Reliable? MOT Data Toyota RAV4 vs Honda CR-V: Which Is More Reliable? How Mileage Affects Your Chances of Passing the MOT How Our Reliability Scores Work

Check Any Vehicle's Full History

MOT results, mileage timeline, AI health score, and market valuations. New users get 5 free credits.

Download for iOS Download for Android
MH
Written by Mike H
Founder of PlateInsight and director of Vehicle Analytics Ltd. 20 years of analytics across retail, e-commerce and financial services. Working with the DVSA MOT dataset.
Data sources: Analysis based on MOT test data published by the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Dataset covers 261 million+ MOT test records. Last updated 2026-08-05.